Search Results for "illegal occupants"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "illegal occupants"

712 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 712 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Clause 4(5) of Government Resolution Denying Identity Cards to Loft Occupants in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Held That the Classification Between Ground Floor and Loft Occupants Is Reasonable and Not Ultra Vires the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

13 Jun 2018

The petitioners, Pameshkumar Nandnlal Sahu, Surendra Budhiram Patel (Verma), and Phulchand Jaitul Nishad, filed writ petitions challenging clause 4(5)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes LIC's Rejection of Tenant's Regularisation Application — LIC Cannot Deny Regularisation to Tenant's Relative in Occupation Since 1967 on Grounds of Unauthorised Subletting Without Proper Inquiry. The Court Held That Family Occupation Does Not Constitute Subletting and That LIC Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice Before Rejecting Such Applications.

27 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Navroz Kershasp Mody, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 8 December 2012 issued by the Regional Manager (Estate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Revenue Orders Passed Under Hyderabad Abolition Inam and Cash Grants Act, 1954 Regarding Occupancy Rights Over Inam Lands at Satara, Aurangabad. The Court Considers Whether Earlier Decisions of Revenue Authorities Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenants Were Legally Valid After Prior Round of Litigation Resulted in Rejection of Such Claims by State Government and Upheld by Higher Courts.

13 Oct 2025

The case involved multiple writ petitions clubbed before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, filed by legal heirs of Inamdars and their successors in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures Under MHADA Act — Held That Occupants in Possession Prior to Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation and Cannot Be Evicted Without Following Due Process Under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.

19 Jul 2022

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by occupants of structures in slum areas in Mumbai, challenging the demolition of their dwell...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Cancelling Regularisation of Unauthorised Occupation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. The Deputy Commissioner's order was set aside as it was passed without hearing the petitioners, who were applicants for regularisation under Section 94 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

17 Jan 2018

The petitioners, 13 individuals, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18.12.2017 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Protection as Slum Occupants on Railway Land — Slum Act Does Not Apply to Central Government Premises Under Article 285(1) of Constitution. The court held that the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 is inapplicable to railway property, and eviction is governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioners, occupants of railway land in Mumbai, filed writ petitions seeking a declaration that they are 'protected occupiers' under the Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

23 Feb 2024

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

26 Apr 2006

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction Under MHADA Act — Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right Over Encroached Land. The court held that the respondents acted within their powers under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, and the petitioners were not entitled to any relief.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, M/s Twin & Deccan Builders and others, filed two writ petitions challenging the demolition of structures on land at Andheri, Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Protection as Slum Occupiers Against Railway Eviction — Slum Act Does Not Apply to Central Government Premises Under Article 285(1) of Constitution. The court held that the Maharashtra Slum Act cannot override the Public Premises Act in respect of Railway property, and petitioners cannot claim protected occupier status.

23 Jan 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions and several interlocutory applications filed by occupants of Railway land in Mumbai. The petitioners in Writ ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)