Search Results for "grievance redressed"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition on Agreeable Terms in Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Challenge — Petitioner's Grievance Redressed by Revenue's Undertaking to Consider Representation

The petitioner, Srinivasan Jayaprakasam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Admits Contempt Appeal with Stay of Sentence and Rejects Recusal Request. Recusal cannot be demanded by litigant without just grounds; unfounded allegations of bias aimed at forum hunting are not countenanced.

The Supreme Court dealt with a criminal appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Seema Sapra against the judgment of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...