Search Results for "goonda activities"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Material. Detenu Granted Bail Months Before Detention Order, Conditions Fulfilled, No Breach of Public Order Established.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the preventive detention of the detenu under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides on Validity of Preventive Detention Orders Under Maharashtra Dangerous Activities Act for Fixing One-Year Detention Period. Detention Orders Challenged as Contrary to Supreme Court Precedent Prohibiting Fixing Maximum Period Without Periodic Review.

The Bombay High Court heard three criminal writ petitions together as they involved a common question of law regarding preventive detention orders pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Were Served in English, Not in Kannada Which Detenu Understood.

The petitioner, Smt. Shylamma, mother of the detenu Abhishek @ Abhi @ Sutta, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...