Search Results for "fishing lease"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"

The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Council's Appeal in Land Allotment Dispute — Sanction of State Government Required Under Section 109 of Madhya Pradesh Municipality Act, 1961. High Court Erred in Quashing Collector's Order Without Considering Mandatory Previous Sanction.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Municipal Council, Neemuch, against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had quashed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Recovery of Fishing Rights Compensation Due to Lack of Evidence of Loss. Agreement for fishing rights at sluice gates did not confer exclusive rights, and plaintiff failed to prove actual loss from alleged breach.

The appellant, originally Orlando Dias and later his widow Maria Fausta Dias, filed a first appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29/10/2005 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pralhad Sadashiv Badole, a retired government servant and former District Fishery Officer at Wardha, was convicted by the Special Judge...