Search Results for "family"

15005 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15005 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Filed by Legal Heirs of Defendant Against Decree in Partition Suit. Appeals Arise from Common Judgment Partly Decreeing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Ancestral Properties.

The appeals arose from a common judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2640/1988 and O.S.No.5075/2000 by the I Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reference on HUF Income Assessment. Income from assets received on partition by a bachelor remains individual income even after marriage, as no HUF is created without blending.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the assessee, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Upholds Use of Mediator and Counsellor Reports. Reports of Child Counsellor and Mediator Regarding Child's Behavior and Attitude Are Not Confidential Under Mediation Confidentiality Rules.

The appellant, Perry Kansagra, a Kenyan and British citizen, and the respondent, Smriti Madan Kansagra, an Indian citizen, married on 29 July 2007 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.5,96,761 to Rs.7,26,700 with 9% Interest for Deceased Aged 45 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Smt. Tarawati, aged 45 years, died in a road accident on 07.02.2003 due to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...