Search Results for "excess work"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "excess work"

1446 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1446 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Former Judicial Department Employee in Pay Revision Dispute Under Article 226 — Pay Fixation Error Not Attributable to Employee's Misrepresentation Causing Extreme Hardship. Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Over Decades Struck Down Following Supreme Court Precedent in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

15 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a former Typist in the Judicial Department of Tamil Nadu, joined service as a Copyist in 1995 and was promoted to Typist in 2000. Upon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Petitioner Was Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Transfer Order Not Challenged on Merits. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the petitioner, including supervision and administrative functions, excluded him from the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Tale, along with 19 other employees, filed a complaint of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of...

High Court

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay; Recovery Set Aside but Pay Revision Upheld. Court Applies Principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih, Holding Recovery Impermissible When Employee Belongs to Group C Service and No Misrepresentation, While Confirming Audit-Based Pay Revision.

8 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Sivasakthi, a Computer Operator working at the Principal District Court,...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay and Retrospective Pay Fixation Orders of a Retired Government Servant. Rule Made Returnable Forthwith and Heard Finally by Consent; Court Examines Natural Justice and Government Resolution Benefits.

25 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Manohar Jairam Sonewane, a retired Deputy Accountant/Sub Treasury Officer (Lower Grade), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Exemption Under Notification No.119/75 for Job Work — Goods Manufactured on Job Work Basis Eligible for Duty Exemption on Job Charges

24 Jun 2010

The Petitioner, M/s Godrej Soap Ltd., filed a Writ Petition challenging an order dated 23.3.1989 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Ex-Parte Decree for Recovery of Excess Payment in Sub-Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Recover Rs.12,55,965.21 with Interest at 6% p.a. Plaintiff proved that defendant fabricated bills and was paid in excess of work done, leading to decree under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC.

6 Jan 2010

The plaintiff, M/s. Offshore Industrial Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs.12,55,965.21 with interest at 18% p.a. against the def...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Alleged Excess Payments from D.Ed College Employees — Recovery Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Refixation of Pay Scale and Grade Pay Set Aside as Unilateral and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

16 Apr 2018

The judgment concerns a group of nine writ petitions filed by employees of D.Ed colleges in Maharashtra, challenging the recovery of amounts allegedly...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

19 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Against Retired Employee in Service Pay Excess Case — Recovery Impermissible When Not Due to Employee's Fault. Recovery of Excess Pay from Terminal Benefits of Retired Employee Declared Illegal Under Article 226; Amount Already Deducted Ordered to Be Refunded with 6% Interest.

6 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a retired employee of Anna University, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a recovery order dated 16.07.2019 and seeki...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserves Cross-Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Award Modifying Dismissal of Security Guard for Negligence and Insubordination to Lesser Punishment; Reinstatement Ordered with 25% Backwages. The Labour Court Set Aside Dismissal Under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Holding That Punishment Was Disproportionate, and Both Parties Challenged the Award.

5 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from two connected writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka: one filed by the workman (W.P.No.52668/2014) and the other by ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)