Search Results for "employer's liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "employer's liability"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, Holding Both Employer and Manager Jointly Liable for Death of Worker in Explosion at Explosive Godown. The court set aside the Commissioner's award exonerating the employer and directed joint and several liability.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the legal heirs of deceased Maroti Misal against the J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurance Company Liable for Death of Employee in Motor Vehicle Accident. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Through Consistent Employment and Wages, Making Employer Liable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

26 Aug 2022

The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.01.2017 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Appeal and Partly Allows Insurer's Cross-Objection in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death of Coal Crusher Operator Arising Out of Employment. Employer and Insurer Held Liable to Pay Compensation of Rs.1,20,973/- with Interest at 12% p.a. from Date of Accident.

14 Dec 2020

The case involves an appeal by the employer, Murudeshwar Ceramics Limited, and a cross-objection by the National Insurance Company Limited against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

24 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

5 Jul 2019

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Hotel Employees Terminated Without Notice or Wages Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-conditions of Notice and Compensation.

5 Dec 2018

The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions filed by workmen and their employer, Eastern International Hotel, challenging an order dated 06/06/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Cases — Holds That Arm's Length Price Determination Must Be Based on Reliable Comparable Data and Functional Analysis. The Tribunal's deletion of adjustments was upheld as it correctly applied functional comparability and permissible adjustments under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

5 Dec 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Co-operative Housing Society in Minimum Wages Claim — Labour Court Application Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Not Maintainable as Society is Not a Commercial Establishment Under Bombay Shops and Establishment Act, 1948.

17 Nov 2006

The appellant, Mahalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged the judgment of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 6486 of 1995, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Valid Defence for Delayed Provident Fund Contributions Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

22 Jun 2005

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) appealed against a Single Judge order that set aside notices/orders dated 17.7.1990 and 24.6.1992 levy...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Section 10 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Directors Not In Charge of Day-to-Day Business at Relevant Time Cannot Be Prosecuted Without Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by directors and a company against criminal proceedings initiated under the Prevention of F...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)