Search Results for "electricity service connection charges"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Theft Case, Remands Matter for Fresh Trial. Acquittal Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider Evidence and Provisions of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), filed an appeal against the order dated 25th August 2006 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Against Decree Declaring Demand Letter Illegal. Court Holds That Dispute Regarding Meter Accuracy Must Be Referred to Electrical Inspector Under Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, and Civil Suit Is Not Maintainable.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (Board) appealed against a decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan, which declared a demand ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Electricity Demand Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demand of Rs. 56,03,815.50 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given before raising the demand under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Twenty First Century Wire Rods Limited, challenged a demand notice dated 22.09.2003 issued by respondent no.3 and the appellate order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...