Search Results for "electricity deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "electricity deposit"

646 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 646 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Theft Case, Remands Matter for Fresh Trial. Acquittal Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider Evidence and Provisions of Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Dec 2019

The appellant, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), filed an appeal against the order dated 25th August 2006 passed by...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition by Distribution Company Challenging Appellate Authority's Order Quashing Supplementary Bill for Unauthorized Use of Electricity. Extension of Supply to Adjacent Plots Without Permission Constitutes Unauthorized Use Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 226, and 227 of the Constit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman's Order for Refund of Service Line Charges and Service Connection Charges. The court held that the Ombudsman had jurisdiction to entertain the consumer's complaint and that the charges were not recoverable upon restoration of contract demand.

7 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Case — Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 Not Applicable to Pre-2003 Dues. The Court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not apply to arrears that accrued before the Act came into force, as the Act is not retrospective.

4 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute between the Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (appellant), a state electricity distribution util...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Injunction Against Electricity Company from Supplying Power to Other Consumers via Dedicated Distribution Facility. Petitioner's Exclusive Right Over DDF Infrastructure Not Established Under Electricity Act, 2003.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Mr. Budreddin A. Khan, a plastic processing factory owner, applied for an electricity connection under the Dedicated Distribution Faci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Limitation Period Under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2003 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that an appeal filed after 4 years and 7 months from the assessment order under Section 126 is time-barred, and the appellate authority has no power to condone delay beyond 30 days.

18 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Alka Agrawal, a consumer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), was alleged to have committed theft of electricity between...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Permanent Lok Adalat Award in Electricity Theft Case — MSEDCL Not Obliged to Issue Regular Bills Pending Criminal Proceedings Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. Permanent Lok Adalat lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes involving criminal offences like theft of electricity under Section 22(C) of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

14 Jan 2022

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenged an award passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Aurangabad, in Pre-litiga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Enhanced Demand in Electricity Theft Case — Appellate Authority Cannot Enhance Contract Demand Without Cross-Objection. Maximum demand for electricity charges cannot be increased by appellate authority in absence of cross-objection by the board under the Electricity Act, 2003.

26 Mar 2018

The petitioner, M/s Ravi Steel Industries, a partnership firm, challenged two appellate orders passed by the Appellate Authority (respondent No.2) und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)