Search Results for "electricity contract"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Clarifies That Sales Tax on Works Contracts Is Levied on Goods Component, Not on Completed Items of Work. Clause 45.2 of GCC Does Not Apply When Tax Is on Transfer of Property in Goods Involved in Works Contract.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court. The dispute arose from works contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Party in Electricity Dues Suit. Addition of Petitioner as Defendant No.2 Upheld Under Order I Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Effectuate Decree.

The petitioner, M/s Manidhari Air Products, challenged an order of the trial court allowing an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...