Search Results for "electricity bill dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "electricity bill dispute"

266 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSEDCL's Challenge to CGRF Order Setting Aside Retrospective Subsidy Recovery. Retrospective Recovery of VM Subsidy Without Prior Notice Held Unjust Under MERC Regulations.

5 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the final order dated 15.01.2025 passed by the Consume...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Electricity Duty Exemption Case: Promissory Estoppel Not Applicable Due to Lack of Clear Representation and Public Interest. The court held that the Industrial Policy 2012 did not create an enforceable right to retrospective exemption, and the notification under Section 9 of the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 was validly made prospective.

1 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had directed the State to...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

6 May 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.

8 Jan 2020

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Tampering or Unauthorized Use Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

7 Jan 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Girish Shankarlal Ostawal and Dilip Shankarlal Ostawal by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

13 Mar 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Jan 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supplementary Electricity Bill for 50 Months' Arrears Against Legal Heir Due to Lack of Notice and Limitation. Retrospective Demand for Arrears Beyond Two Years Held Barred Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003, and Change of Meter Without Consumer's Knowledge Vitiated the Demand.

6 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mrs. Veena S. Bajaj, filed a writ petition challenging two electricity bills dated 24th November 2000 and 18th July 2001 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds BEST's Right to Recover Electricity Dues for Under-Recording Due to Loose Connections — Consumer Liable for Unrecorded Consumption Despite Absence of Malice. The court held that a consumer must pay for electricity actually consumed even if the meter under-recorded due to a technical defect, as the consumer had the benefit of the supply and the defect was not disputed.

4 Feb 2005

The case involves a dispute between the Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking) and Sharda Dyeing & Printing Works, a consumer of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Electricity Bill Disconnection for Non-Payment. Held that the Electricity Ombudsman's order directing payment of arrears before reconnection was valid and within jurisdiction under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Mr. Awadesh S. Pandey, a proprietor of Sunshine Plastic Industries, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombu...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)