Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "duty paid"

6690 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6690 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay allows importer's writ petition challenging Settlement Commission order that failed to apply lowest transaction value rule for identical goods under Customs Valuation Rules; directs reduction of duty demand from Rs.23,01,077 to Rs.3 lakhs. Court holds that Settlement Commission is bound by the Customs Act and Valuation Rules, and must adopt the lowest of multiple identical goods' transaction values when available.

27 Jul 2010

The dispute arose from imports of electronic goods by the petitioner during 1995-96. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence investigated alleged unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SVLDRS-3 Demand for Interest Component Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Interest paid under protest prior to show cause notice is part of tax dues under Section 124(2) of Finance Act, 2019.

13 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, National Centre for the Performing Arts, a public trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and engaged in providin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IB for Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts. Court Held That Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts Are Profits Derived From Business Under Section 80-IB of Income Tax Act, 1961, as They Reimburse Manufacturing and Exporting Costs, Following Meghalaya Steels Limited and Topman Exports Precedents.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by an assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting wooden handicraft items, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

31 Jul 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Customs Duty on Non-Delivered Goods. Importer's Refund Claim Rejected by Customs Authority Due to Inter-Departmental Dispute over Liability, Sections 13, 23, 27A of Customs Act, 1962 Involved.

19 Nov 2025

The petitioner, a company manufacturing PVC/CPVC pipes, imported 100 metric tons of Polyvinyl Chloride Resin SG-5 Erdos. It filed Bill of Entry No. 84...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Endorsement on RT-12 Return Constitutes Notice of Demand Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Court examines the rejection of a declaration under the KVS Scheme on the ground of absence of a show cause notice, where the RT-12 return contained a specific demand endorsement.

29 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a manufacturer of processed fabrics, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its declaration u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Country Liquor Manufacturer Against Inclusion of State Excise Duty in Sale Price for Sales Tax. State Excise Duty paid directly by purchaser is not part of sale price under Section 2(28) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

3 Sep 2010

The petitioners, Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited (a cooperative society) and its office bearer, are manufacturers of country liquor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)