Search Results for "distinctive feature"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distinctive feature"

145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.

21 Mar 2006

The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Deceptive Similarity of Trade Marks 'Sri Andal' and 'Sri Ambal' in Snuff Dispute. Phonetic Affinity Between Mark Names Renders Consumer Confusion Likely Under Section 12(1) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

14 Apr 1969

The dispute arose when K.R. Chinna Krishna Chettiar, sole proprietor of Radha & Co., applied for registration of a trade mark for snuff consisting of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

14 Sep 2016

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Involving 'Kalpataru' Mark. The plaintiff, a well-known real estate developer, successfully restrained the defendants from using the mark 'Kalpataru' for their housing project, as it was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered and well-known trademark.

9 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer established in 1975, has used the mark 'Kalpataru' as an integral part of its c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving 'TANGO PUNCH' and 'TANGO CHARLIE' for Country Liquor. Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles by Defendant Constitutes Infringement of Registered Composite Mark.

2 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., and the Defendant, Lokranjan Breweries Pvt. Ltd., both manufacture and sell country liquor. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5001'. The court held that the Defendant's mark 'COX 5001' is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND', constituting infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and passing off under Section 135.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a commercial suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, Jagpin Brewerise Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Vacation of Interim Injunction in 'RACIRAFT' vs 'ESIRAFT' Trademark Case. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Mark 'ESIRAFT' is Deceptively Similar to the Registered Mark 'RACIRAFT' for Pharmaceutical Products, Applying the Anti-Dissection Rule and Principles of Phonetic and Visual Similarity.

8 Apr 2026

The case involved a commercial appeal filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. against an order of the Single Judge vacating an ad-interim injuncti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

28 Apr 2026

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Applications in Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over 'NFC' Element. Court Holds that Abbreviation 'NFC' for Natural Fibre Composite is Descriptive and Not Entitled to Interim Protection Without Evidence of Secondary Meaning Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

26 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed before the Madras High Court by two plaintiffs: an individual, B.L. Bengani, and his company, Indowud N...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)