Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving 'TANGO PUNCH' and 'TANGO CHARLIE' for Country Liquor. Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles by Defendant Constitutes Infringement of Registered Composite Mark.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 113
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., and the Defendant, Lokranjan Breweries Pvt. Ltd., both manufacture and sell country liquor. The Plaintiff filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off, claiming a registered composite mark 'TANGO PUNCH' (Registration No. 1051107 in Class 33) with the word 'TANGO' as an essential feature, used with or without a device of a raised palm with three fingers upright embossed on its glass bottles. The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant was vending its own liquor in the Plaintiff's embossed bottles and using the mark 'TANGO CHARLIE', which infringes the Plaintiff's mark. The Defendant opposed, arguing that the Plaintiff's registration is for a composite label, not a word mark, and that 'TANGO' is descriptive and common to the trade. The court considered the nature of the mark, the use of embossed bottles, and the balance of convenience. The court found that the Plaintiff had a prima facie case, as the word 'TANGO' is an essential feature of the composite mark, and the Defendant's use of identical bottles and the mark 'TANGO CHARLIE' could cause confusion. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using bottles bearing the mark 'TANGO' or any deceptively similar mark, and from using the Plaintiff's embossed bottles. The court also directed the Defendant to maintain accounts of sales under the impugned mark.

Headnote

A) Trade Marks - Infringement - Composite Mark - Essential Feature - The Plaintiff's registered composite mark 'TANGO PUNCH' includes the word 'TANGO' as an essential feature; use of 'TANGO' by the Defendant in 'TANGO CHARLIE' for identical goods may constitute infringement even if the mark is composite. (Paras 2-3)

B) Trade Marks - Passing Off - Embossed Bottles - The Defendant's use of the Plaintiff's embossed bottles bearing the mark 'TANGO' and three-finger device for selling its own liquor amounts to passing off. (Para 2)

C) Trade Marks - Interim Injunction - Balance of Convenience - The Plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience favors grant of interim injunction to restrain the Defendant from using bottles with the mark 'TANGO' or any deceptively similar mark. (Para 22)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the use of the word 'TANGO' by the Defendant in its mark 'TANGO CHARLIE' for country liquor infringes the Plaintiff's registered composite mark 'TANGO PUNCH' and whether the Defendant's use of the Plaintiff's embossed bottles amounts to passing off.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the Notice of Motion and granted an interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using bottles bearing the mark 'TANGO' or any deceptively similar mark, and from using the Plaintiff's embossed bottles. The Defendant was also directed to maintain accounts of sales under the impugned mark.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • composite mark
  • essential feature
  • passing off
  • interim injunction
  • descriptive mark
  • common to trade
  • deceptive similarity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (09) 100

Notice of Motion No. 1027 of 2014 in Suit No. 559 of 2014

2014-09-02

G.S. Patel, J.

Dr. V. V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. H. Kamod, & Mr. N. Sharma, i/b M/s W.S. Kane and Co. for Plaintiff; Mr. R. M. Kadam, Senior Advocate, a/w Mr. R. Khandekar and Mr. K.S Pachoo with Ms. T. Lime i/b A. Kayser & Co. for Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit for trademark infringement and passing off with application for interim injunction.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks interim injunction restraining Defendant from using bottles with the trade mark TANGO or any other mark with TANGO in respect of country liquor.

Filing Reason

Defendant allegedly vending its own liquor in Plaintiff's embossed bottles and using mark 'TANGO CHARLIE' infringing Plaintiff's registered mark 'TANGO PUNCH'.

Issues

Whether the use of the word 'TANGO' by the Defendant in its mark 'TANGO CHARLIE' infringes the Plaintiff's registered composite mark 'TANGO PUNCH'? Whether the Defendant's use of the Plaintiff's embossed bottles amounts to passing off?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff: The word TANGO is an essential feature of the registered composite mark 'TANGO PUNCH'; Defendant's use of 'TANGO CHARLIE' and its bottles infringes the mark and amounts to passing off. Defendant: The Plaintiff's registration is for a composite label, not a word mark; TANGO is descriptive and common to the trade; the marks are distinguishable.

Ratio Decidendi

In a composite mark, if a word is an essential feature, its use by another for identical goods may constitute infringement. The use of identical embossed bottles by the Defendant for its own liquor amounts to passing off. The Plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience favors grant of interim injunction.

Judgment Excerpts

The Plaintiff claims to have a registered trade mark 'TANGO PUNCH' under registration no.1051107 in Class 33, of which the word TANGO is said to be an essential, leading and memorable feature. The Defendant has been found to be vending its own distillations in the Plaintiff's embossed bottles.

Procedural History

The Plaintiff filed Suit No. 559 of 2014 for trademark infringement and passing off. The present Notice of Motion No. 1027 of 2014 was taken out for interim relief. The court reserved judgment on 21st August 2014 and pronounced it on 2nd September 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving 'TANGO PUNCH' and 'TANGO CHARLIE' for Country Liquor. Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles by Defendant Constitutes Infringement of Registered Composite Mark.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Contempt Case for Violation of Asset Restraint Orders. The court found that the review petitioner failed to show any error apparent on record justifying interference, as the omitted reply did not contradict ...