Search Results for "disproportionate gain"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Industrial Court’s Remand Order; Reinforces Fairness in Proportionate Punishment in Labor Disputes. Unfair Labor Practice in Dismissal Addressed under the Doctrine of Proportionality.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, examined a labor dispute where the petitioner, a former employee, contested his dismissal on the grounds of unfai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Out of Defence for Non-Payment of Interim Maintenance in DV Act Case. Failure to Pay Maintenance Justifies Coercive Measure Under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Girish Vijaysingh Pardeshi, challenged an order dated 31/03/2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 7, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Compensation to Airman for Vindictive Disciplinary Action Over Trivial Incident at Railway Crossing. The Court held that the officer's conduct was disproportionate and vindictive, and the Union of India must compensate the appellant with liberty to recover from the officer.

The appellant, S.P. Pandey, was an Airman in the Indian Air Force with unblemished service from 1997 to 2011. On 17 May 2010, while returning from dut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Bank Officer for Misconduct in Loan Transaction. Disciplinary proceedings based on loan of Rs.6,500 sanctioned in 1976 held valid despite delay, as charges of moral turpitude and pecuniary benefit were proved.

The petitioner, Shri Sagar Sadashiv Kasture, was initially appointed as a Clerk in the Central Bank of India on 5 March 1973 and later promoted as an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears writ petition challenging blacklisting order of consultant by MCGM for alleged collusion in road works. Dispute concerns alleged denial of natural justice in blacklisting process under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a request for qualification issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 23 October 2013, inviting consultan...