Search Results for "dilapidated structure"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging TAC Report on Building's Structural Stability — Expert Technical Opinion Not Amenable to Judicial Review on Merits. Writ Court Cannot Substitute Its Own View on Technical Matters; TAC Guidelines from MCGM v State of Maharashtra Followed.

The petitioners, six tenants of a chawl in Bhiwandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the report of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Anticipatory Bail in Building Collapse; Alleged Negligent Chipping of Columns Not Causa Causans According to Applicant. Licensee Seeks Pre-Arrest Bail, Contending No Gross Negligence and Exoneration by Municipal Committee Reports.

The matter involved an anticipatory bail application filed by Sundeep Bafna before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant had taken the underground a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).

The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple and Construction of Commercial Complex. Petitioners Failed to Establish Temple as Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

The petitioners, residents of Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the demolition of a temple dedicated to Lord Hanuman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Heritage Market Buildings. Heritage Classification Does Not Bar Demolition for Public Safety Under Section 2(1ea) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.

The petitioners, residents of Mysuru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respond...