Search Results for "demand verification"

940 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 940 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Return to Paper Ballots or 100% VVPAT Counting in Elections. Court Upholds EVMs with VVPAT as Sufficiently Transparent and Reliable, Rejects Allegations of Manipulation Without Evidence.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms and others seeking various directions regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits High Court Chobdar in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Reversed Due to Unreliable Complainant Evidence and Lack of Proper Verification of Bribe Demand.

The appeal arose from a conviction of Shridhar Chavan, a Chobdar (attendant) in the High Court of Bombay, under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. Shobha Sonba Raut, was serving as Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer at Osmanabad. The complainant, Dattatraya Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Balkrishna Bhau Desai, a Sectional Engineer in the Public Works Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Baramati for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Sub-Engineer in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Electric Connection Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Anil Krishnarao Apashingkar, was a Sub-Engineer with M.S.E.D.C.L. The complainant, Jagannath Rajaram Mane, applied for an electric conn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant Kapile, was a Senior Clerk in the Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office, CIDCO, Aurangabad. The complainant, Dharamchan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhav Bhalchandra Rajurkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for demanding and accepti...