Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Evidence of Suppression. CESTAT's finding that there was no misdeclaration or suppression of facts by the importer upheld, and the demand for differential duty beyond normal period was barred by limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

21 Sep 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against an order of the Customs Excise and S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Under Section 11AA Not Payable When Goods Cleared Under Provisional Assessment. Court holds that interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted when goods are cleared pending finalisation of classification list, as the assessment is provisional.

20 Mar 2012

The appellant-assessee, originally known as Morris Electronics Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of soft ferrite components. It filed a classificat...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Customs Department Appeal Against Interim Order Directing Release of Areca Nuts Consignment Without Bank Guarantee. Court Holds That Provisional Assessment Under Section 17 of Customs Act, 1962 Read with CAROTAR, 2020 Requires Bond and Bank Guarantee for Release Pending Verification of SAFTA Certificate of Origin.

27 Apr 2026

The present intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports) and other competent authoritie...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Coconut Oil Classification Dispute — Holds Pure Coconut Oil in Small Packings Classifiable as Hair Oil Under Heading 3305. The Court applied Section Note 2 and Chapter Note 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, ruling that packaging for retail sale as hair oil overrides classification as edible oil under Heading 1513.

13 Dec 2024

The case involved appeals by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. concerning the clas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Service Tax Case on Design Services. Engineering Design & Drawings Imported for Manufacturing Wind Turbine Generators Held Taxable as 'Design Services' Under Finance Act, 1994.

10 Apr 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the CESTAT order which held that 'Engineering Design & Drawings' imported by M/s Suzlon Energy Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Settlement Application in Customs Duty Case — Settlement Commission Cannot Reject Application on Grounds Not Specified in Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962. The court held that the conditions for rejection of a settlement application are only those enumerated in Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Settlement Commission cannot impose additional conditions such as requiring the applicant to admit the entire duty liability before filing the application.

21 Nov 2016

The petitioner, M/s Auto Creaters, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the common order dated 14th March ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Customs Department's Reference Application in Export Valuation Case. Tribunal's finding that facts were indistinguishable from precedent upheld, no question of law arises.

12 Dec 2025

The Principal Commissioner of Customs filed a Civil Petition under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the final order of the Central E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Stators and Rotors of Hermetic Motors Classifiable as Parts of Electric Motors, Not Compressors. Approved Classification Lists Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Material Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged a show cause notice dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Order-in-Original for Defying Advance Ruling on Betel Nut Classification. Authority for Advance Rulings' classification of betel nut products under CTH 2106 90 30 is binding on Customs authorities under Section 28J of the Customs Act, 1962.

18 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Isha Exim, a business engaged in importing edible products including processed betel nut (supari), challenged an Order-in-Original dat...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)