Search Results for "counter guarantee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "counter guarantee"

318 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Tender Dispute, Quashing High Court's Order and Permitting Project Completion. The Court held that judicial review in tender matters is limited to examining legality under Article 14 of the Constitution, and interference is unwarranted unless the decision is manifestly arbitrary, unjust, or mala fide, as per Tata Cellular v. Union of India.

21 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process initiated by the Road Construction Department of Jharkhand for the reconstruction of Nagaruntari–Dhurki–Am...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Proceedings — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Application Under Section 31(1)(aa) is Maintainable Against Guarantors Without Separate Suit and Not Barred by Limitation.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Guarantee Dispute — Guarantor's Liability Not Discharged by Family Settlement Without Bank's Consent. Family Settlement Between Guarantor and Principal Debtor Does Not Discharge Guarantor Under Section 134 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

7 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Narinder Pal Agarwal, was a director and guarantor of Narendra Metal Converters Pvt. Ltd., which had taken loans from Saraswat Coopera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Order Restraining Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee — Directs Bank to Pay Proceeds to Beneficiary Without Third-Party Deposit Condition. The court held that a bank guarantee is an independent contract and cannot be restrained except in cases of fraud or irretrievable injustice; directing deposit in a third-party account is impermissible.

20 Jun 2016

The present appeal was filed by Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), the original plaintiff, challenging an ad-interim order passed by a learned Single Judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Time-Barred Counterclaim in Arbitration. Limitation for Counterclaim Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Subsequent Correspondence.

16 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from an order dated 1 October 2012 passed by a learned Single Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

13 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaims as Time-Barred. Court holds that limitation for counterclaims arising from same transaction as main claim is governed by Article 1 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the arbitral tribunal erred in applying a strict three-year period from the date of termination without considering the continuing breach and the date of final bill.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rolta India Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

12 Dec 2005

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging MSME Facilitation Council Reference and Award — Held That Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Does Not Require Prior Agreement for Reference and That Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to Setting Aside of Award.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Morarjee Textiles Ltd., its Head of Finance, and its Executive Director and Chairperson, challengi...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)