Search Results for "contractual discretion"

507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Interest and Escalation Claims. Court holds that interest under Section 34 CPC is discretionary and that escalation claims not pleaded cannot be awarded.

The dispute arose out of a contract for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A in Goa awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Advocates Challenging Police Verification for Gun Licenses — No Fundamental Right to Carry Firearms. Requirement of Police Verification Under Arms Act, 1959 is a Reasonable Restriction and Not Arbitrary.

The case involves five writ petitions filed by legal practitioners (advocates) challenging the requirement of police verification for grant of firearm...