Search Results for "consumer forum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "consumer forum"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Execution of Decrees Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact by Cooperative Courts. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution, it cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed in execution proceedings und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

19 Jan 2012

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...

High Court

Court Orders MSEDCL to Refund Excess Charges to Consumers Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. found in violation of MERC orders; Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum directs refunds with interest.

16 Jul 2024

The consolidated petitions, involving orders passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) in individual complaints against the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition, Upholds Medical Reimbursement for District Consumer Forum President. Member of District Consumer Forum is a government servant entitled to medical reimbursement under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

14 Jan 2016

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) that directe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Non-Party — Order Directing Compensation to Complainants Set Aside as Petitioner Not Impleaded as Opposite Party. The Court Held That No Order Can Be Passed Against a Person Without Giving Them an Opportunity of Being Heard, and the Consumer Forum Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

20 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Govind Dewaji Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 27-12-2016 passed by the District Consumer Disput...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Class Action by Homebuyers Under Section 35(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Builder's Objection on Miniscule Percentage Rejected. Commonality of Interest Found in Delay in Possession and Unfair Trade Practices, Allowing Representative Complaint for All 1134 Apartment Purchasers.

17 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Brigade Enterprises Limited, a builder, against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

4 Mar 2025

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

13 Nov 2025

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Del...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)