Search Results for "consent modification"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Petition for Extension of Bank Guarantee Pending Challenge to Arbitral Award — Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Post-award interim protection can be granted under Section 9 to preserve the subject matter of arbitration pending challenge to award.

The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Involving Trademark Ownership Dispute. The Court upheld NCLAT's finding that NCLT's declaration of trademark ownership impermissibly modified the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeal arose from a dispute over trademark ownership in the context of a corporate insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankrupt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Discharge from Undertaking in Consent Terms — Undertaking Given in Consent Terms Cannot Be Modified Unilaterally Without Proof of Fraud or Mistake.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 27 June 2011, dismissing a Notice of Motion taken out by the Appellants ...