Search Results for "concurrent orders reversed"

283 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 283 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petitions Against Appellate Court's Reversal of Eviction Obstruction and Mesne Profits Orders. The court held that an obstructor claiming through a tenant cannot resist eviction after a decree against the tenant, and mesne profits are independent of possession.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the landlord, Udyavara R. Acharya and Ramadevi R. Acharya, against the respondent, Jugal Kishor Jagannat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.

The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities in Pond Land Dispute. High Court Exceeded Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 by Reappreciating Evidence Without Perversity.

The dispute pertains to Khasra No.103 (formerly Khasra No.84) in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. In 1970, the land was recorded as 'Johad (Pond)' in revenue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes NOC for HPCL Petrol Pump Due to Violation of Distance Norms Under Petroleum Rules, 2002. Court holds that the appellate authority failed to consider the mandatory distance requirement from an existing petrol pump and the objections of the petitioner.

The petitioner, G. Alagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 19.3.2026 passed by the 1s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Tenant's claim of possession based on purchase of shed and payment of rent rejected as findings of fact by courts below were not perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Laxman N. Deshmukh, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 394 of 1983 before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara, seeking possession of a ...