Search Results for "compromise fees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "compromise fees"

223 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amounts in Admiralty Suits — Admiralty Jurisdiction — Sheriff's Fees — Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 — Court ruled that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

17 Jan 2018

The Bombay High Court addressed two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide a common issue regarding the payment of poundage to the Sherif...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR and Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Husband and Wife. The Court Held That Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Can Be Invoked to Quash Non-Compoundable Offences When Parties Have Genuinely Settled the Dispute and Continuation of Proceedings Would Be Futile.

3 Mar 2021

The applicants, including the husband (applicant no.1), his father (applicant no.2), his married sisters (applicant nos.3 and 4), and other relatives,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Court Fee Matter — Declaration Suit Not Attracting Ad Valorem Fee Under Section 7(iv-A) U.P. Amendment. Decree for Mere Declaration of Title Is Not a 'Decree for Money or Other Property' and a Decree Ad Invitum Is Not an 'Instrument Securing Money or Other Property' Under the Court Fees Act, 1870, as Amended by U.P. Legislature.

26 Sep 1969

The dispute originated from a property inheritance matter. One Radhey Lal had filed Suit No. 4 of 1950 in the court of the Civil Judge, Jaunpur, claim...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of 75% Court Fee on Unconditional Withdrawal of Appeal Before Commencement of Hearing Under Section 66(2)(c) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Appellant Entitled to Refund as Withdrawal Was Unconditional and Before Hearing Commenced.

6 Jun 2018

The appellant, Sri Jagadeeshaiah, filed Regular First Appeal No.1475/2014 under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Judgment Creditor in Execution of Hong Kong Decree, Upholding Licensee's Right to Continue Occupation and Security Interest in Flat. Leave and License Agreement Creates a Charge and Right to Possession Until Security Deposit Refunded, Not Subject to Revocation Under Sections 59 and 60 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.

2 May 2006

The case involved an appeal against an order of a Single Judge who had allowed a Chamber Summons filed by Respondent No.2, ING Bank N.V., a licensee u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amount in Admiralty Suit — Poundage Calculated on Amount Actually Realized Under Warrant of Arrest, Not on Claim Value.

17 Jan 2014

The plaintiffs, Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Ltd., filed an Admiralty Suit against the vessel M.V. Tongil Yantai and its owners for...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

10 Sep 2015

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

13 Jan 2026

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)