Search Results for "cogent material requirement"

1073 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1073 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears First Appeal Against Partial Decree in Suit for Specific Performance of Development Agreement. Trial Court Declared Forfeiture of Advance Unlawful but Denied Specific Performance, and Appellant Seeks Reversal.

This First Appeal challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2013 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Vasco in Special Civil Suit No. 13/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Imminent Possibility of Release on Bail. Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Cogent Material or Satisfaction That Detenu in Custody Would Be Released on Bail.

The petitioner, Nitin Baban Pawar, challenged an order of detention dated 19th May 2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under the Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land in Malad. Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Seeks Higher Compensation Than Awarded by SLAO.

These proceedings arose from the acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquired property comprised land bearing Survey No. 91 ...