Search Results for "chamber summons"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "chamber summons"

391 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — Decree Not Null and Void Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That a Consent Decree Can Be Executed Even If It Contains Terms Beyond the Suit, Provided Parties Freely Consented.

20 Dec 2018

The case arises from a commercial suit (Suit No. 119 of 2016) filed by Mahesh P. Raheja, Preeti P. Raheja, and Shakuntala P. Raheja (Respondent Nos. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of 3014 Days Delay in Filing Appeal — Gross Negligence and Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 3014 days in filing appeal against arbitration order not condoned as applicants failed to explain each day's delay and showed gross negligence.

27 Apr 2016

The applicants, Padmsey Khimji Chheda and another, filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of 3014 days delay in filing Appeal (Lodging) No. 569 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

27 Sep 2012

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC.

27 Aug 2014

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit w...

High Court

Notice of Motion to Quash Undefended Suit Order and Condonation of Delay. A Legal Challenge to Balance Procedural Flexibility and Strict Timelines Under the Commercial Courts Act

10 Jun 2024

Notice of Motion requesting to quash and set aside orders that moved a suit to the undefended list due to the defendants' failure to file a written st...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution Against Partner in Consent Decree — Order XXI Rule 50 CPC. Leave under Order XXI Rule 50 CPC is required to execute a consent decree against a partner of a partnership firm, and the execution application and warrant of attachment can be amended to include the partner's name.

29 Aug 2005

The plaintiffs, M/s. G.M. Breweries Ltd., filed five summary suits against various defendants, including partnership firms. In Suit No.1791 of 2002, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Disclosure Application Against Judgment Debtors Despite Suit Disposal — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Applicable in Execution Proceedings. Court Rejects Functus Officio Argument and Holds That Existence of Security Does Not Bar Disclosure Order.

14 Jan 2019

The Plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1.26 Crores against the Defendants, which was decreed by consent terms dated 14th June 2016, wherein the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Heir to Join Testamentary Suits as Party-Defendant in Will Dispute. Daughter of Predeceased Brother Held to Have Sufficient Interest in Estate of Testator Without Children.

23 Jun 2016

The judgment concerns two Chamber Summonses filed by Jyotsna Rasiklal Maniar, who claims to be the daughter of Prabhudas Chaganlal Mehta, the predecea...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)