Search Results for "benami transfer"

62 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 62 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Trial and First Appellate Court. High Court's Reversal Set Aside for Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Second Appeal Scope Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over possession of agricultural land. The plaintiff, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, filed a suit for recovery of possession based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Benami Transaction Not Proved. Suit for declaration and possession decreed as plaintiff established title through sale deed and possession, while defendant failed to prove that property was purchased benami in plaintiff's name.

The appellant-defendant Mahadev filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the concurrent judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Apportionment Dispute Among Co-owners. Court holds that the Land Acquisition Court has jurisdiction to decide title and apportion compensation among co-owners under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a dispute among the children of Shripad Deo regarding the apportionment of compensation awarded by the State of Maharashtra for acqu...