Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "benami shares"
34 result(s) found
Found 34 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Partition Dispute, Reversing High Court's Decision on Self-Acquired Property Status. The Court held that the High Court exceeded jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by deciding a factual issue, and the property was self-acquired as purchased after partition using own funds, not joint family funds.
22 Apr 2025The dispute involved a property partition suit among family members. The appellant, as Defendant No.2, purchased the suit property from Defendant No.1...
- 366
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Adverse Possession and Benami Transaction. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession, and the defendants established adverse possession for over 12 years, rejecting the claim of benami ownership under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.
7 Jan 2025The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (respondents) and the defendants (appellants) over 5.82 acres of land in Survey No. 211/1....
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Stay on Personal Guarantee Enforcement in CDR Failure Case — Deed of Guarantee Held Not Enforceable Due to Conditional Nature and Subsequent Termination Events. The court found that the guarantee was conditional upon CDR sanction and automatically terminated upon CDR failure and the guarantor's resignation, making it unenforceable against the personal guarantor.
14 Dec 2024The Plaintiff, Deepen Arun Parekh, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the Deed of Guarantee dated 10 April 2014 executed by him in favour of the ...
- 366
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of FIR in Corruption Case Due to Incorrect Legal Test. Investigation Must Proceed as FIR Discloses Cognizable Offence Based on Suspicion Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.
1 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a complaint lodged by Uchit Sharma against Aman Singh, a former Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh, and ...
- 219
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reinstates Prosecution of Public Servant and Spouse in Prevention of Corruption Act Case for Disproportionate Assets. High Court's Discharge Order Quashed as It Erred in Re-appreciating Evidence at Charge Framing Stage Under Section 239 CrPC, Failing to Consider Prima Facie Case Based on FIR and Charge Sheet Materials.
5 Sep 2022The Supreme Court heard appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against the Madras High Court's judgment discharging a public servant and his wife from pro...
- 411
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act Case, Granting Independent Tenure Holder Status to Sub-lessees. Sub-lessees under a government lessee for agricultural purposes qualify as tenure holders under Sections 3(9) and 3(17) of the Act, rebutting the presumption under Section 5 Explanation II, and are exempt from lease deed transfer conditions due to agricultural use.
10 Jan 2022The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Uttarakhand dismissing writ petitions filed by the appellants, who were sub-lessees unde...
- 732
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.
14 Dec 2021The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...
- 206
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Failure to Consider Adverse Possession and Limitation. The Court held that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not framing an issue on limitation and adverse possession despite evidence of long possession by the appellants, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
12 Mar 2020The appellants, original defendants, filed a Second Appeal against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court decreeing t...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Union Minister in PMLA Case — Economic Offence Bail Principles Reiterated. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA are not absolute and must be applied with reference to the facts, and that once investigation is substantially complete, custodial interrogation is not necessary.
15 Nov 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of P. Chidambaram against the Delhi High Court's order denying him regular bail in a money laundering case regist...
- 369
