Search Results for "award under 1894 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "award under 1894 Act"

1147 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1147 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals Despite Limitation, Emphasizes Liberal Approach for Illiterate Claimants. The court held that delay in filing reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 should be condoned when claimant is illiterate and not advised about limitation.

16 Feb 2026

The present appeals arise from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court concerning land acquisition matters. The appellant, Bhalabhai Fatabhai Khan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

17 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Navi Mumbai Airport Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 6, 9, 11 — Petitioner failed to prove ownership or possession of acquired land; compensation rightly awarded to recorded tenants.

2 May 2023

The petitioner, Ashok Hari Shitlani, filed a writ petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Consent Award Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Remains Valid Despite Land Owner's Refusal to Accept Compensation, Precluding Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for resettlement of Narmada Project oustees. The re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Development Authority in Land Acquisition and Urban Scheme Case Due to Valid Delegation and Implementation. Delegation of Power to Collector Under Section 5-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Was Implicit and Valid, and Scheme Did Not Lapse Under Section 54 of Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, as Substantial Steps Were Taken Within Three Years.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Indore Development Authority (IDA) against a common judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that had quashed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in International Commercial Arbitration for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. The court found that the arbitrator relied on unproved documents and denied adequate opportunity to the petitioner, warranting setting aside of the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Thomas Cook (India) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Solatium and Interest Granted on Enhanced Compensation. The court held that solatium under Section 30 and interest under Section 69 of the 2013 Act are mandatory and must be paid on the entire enhanced compensation awarded by the Reference Court.

16 Dec 2021

The petitioners, landowners from Sukewadi and Akole in Ahmednagar district, filed writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Reference Court under...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

17 Aug 2020

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Upholding Enhanced Compensation for Claimants. The court held that the Reference Court's reliance on sale instances and potential value of land for non-agricultural use was justified, and no deduction for development charges was warranted.

27 Apr 2020

The case involves four first appeals filed by the Executive Engineer, Beed Irrigation Division, through Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Cor...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)