Search Results for "audit under GST"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to Be Identical, Indicating Non-Application of Mind by Adjudicating Authority.

The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged an assessment order dated 31 March 2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST Audit Permissible for Period When Registration Was Active, Even If Cancelled Later. "Registered or Deregistered, Compliance Obligation Under SGST Act Persists."

Acts and Sections Discussed: Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (SGST Act) Section 2(13) - Definition of "audit." Section 2(94) - Def...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Refund of Rs.56 Crore Service Tax Deposit Retained Without Authority of Law. Petitioner Bank's deposit made under protest to buy peace on interchange income cannot be retained without show cause notice or adjudication order.

The petitioner, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the retent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation Without Notice. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017 set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.

The petitioner, Dee Vee Projects Ltd., a public limited company engaged in infrastructure development, was registered under the erstwhile State Sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...