Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDR Scheme Application — Quantification of Demand Prior to Cut-off Date Admitted During Investigation. The Court held that the Petitioner's admission of service tax liability during investigation before 30 June 2019 constituted quantification of demand, making the Petitioner eligible under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, despite the show cause notice being issued after the cut-off date.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 353
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Kuber Health Food And Allied Services Pvt. Ltd., registered under the Finance Act, 1994 for service tax on Outdoor Catering Services and Manpower Supply Services. On 11 April 2018, the premises were visited by Intelligence Officers, and documents were called for. Summons were issued, and statements of authorized officers were recorded. On 16 April 2019, in the statement of Shri Vithal Sunder Nayak, the Petitioner admitted service tax liability for the years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018. The Petitioner paid Rs.20,08,662/- for 2013-2014, and the balance demand of Rs.1,39,58,752/- pertained to 2014-2015 to 2017-2018. The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR Scheme) was introduced on 21 August 2019, with a cut-off date of quantification of demand on or before 30 June 2019. On 16 October 2019, a show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner, reproducing the quantification admitted during investigation and demanding Rs.1,50,37,871/- for the period 2014 to 2017 along with interest and penalty. The Petitioner applied under the SVLDR Scheme in Form SVLDRS-1, mentioning Rs.1,50,37,871/- as duty quantified, taken from the show cause notice. The Respondents issued Form SVLDRS-2 rejecting the application on the ground that quantification was post 30 June 2019. The Petitioner challenged this rejection. The Court considered whether the quantification was made before the cut-off date. The Petitioner argued that the quantification was admitted during investigation prior to 30 June 2019, and the show cause notice merely reproduced that admission. The Respondents contended that the quantification in the show cause notice was the relevant quantification. The Court held that the quantification of demand was made by the Petitioner during investigation on 16 April 2019, before the cut-off date. The show cause notice did not make a fresh quantification but only reproduced the admitted amount. Therefore, the Petitioner was eligible for the Scheme. The Court allowed the petition, set aside the rejection, and directed the Respondents to process the application in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Service Tax - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Eligibility - Quantification of Demand - The Petitioner admitted service tax liability during investigation prior to 30 June 2019, and the show cause notice issued after that date merely reproduced the admitted quantification. The Court held that the quantification of demand was made before the cut-off date, and the Petitioner is eligible for the Scheme. The rejection of the application was set aside. (Paras 1-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Petitioner is eligible to avail the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, when the quantification of demand was admitted during investigation prior to 30 June 2019, but the show cause notice quantifying the demand was issued after that date.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition, set aside the rejection of the Petitioner's application under the SVLDR Scheme, and directed the Respondents to process the application in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme
  • 2019
  • quantification of demand
  • cut-off date 30 June 2019
  • admission during investigation
  • show cause notice
  • eligibility
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (11) 221

WRIT PETITION NO.611 OF 2023

2024-11-22

M. S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain

Shreyas Shreevastava, Saurabh Rajan Mashelkar for Petitioner; Kavita Shukla, Ram Ochani for Respondents

Kuber Health Food And Allied Services Pvt. Ltd

Union of India, Joint Director DGGI, Commissioner GST & Central Excised, Designated Committee under Section 126 of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging rejection of application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the rejection of its application under the SVLDR Scheme and direction to process the application.

Filing Reason

The Petitioner's application under the SVLDR Scheme was rejected on the ground that quantification of demand was made after 30 June 2019.

Previous Decisions

The Respondents issued Form SVLDRS-2 rejecting the Petitioner's application.

Issues

Whether the quantification of demand was made before 30 June 2019, making the Petitioner eligible under the SVLDR Scheme. Whether the show cause notice issued after the cut-off date can be considered as quantification of demand.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Quantification was admitted during investigation on 16 April 2019, prior to the cut-off date. The show cause notice merely reproduced the admitted amount. The Petitioner disclosed more than required in the application and should not be penalised. Respondents: The quantification in the show cause notice dated 16 October 2019 is the relevant quantification, which is after 30 June 2019, making the Petitioner ineligible.

Ratio Decidendi

The quantification of demand for the purpose of eligibility under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, is the quantification made by the assessee during investigation prior to the cut-off date of 30 June 2019, and not the quantification in the show cause notice issued after that date, if the show cause notice merely reproduces the earlier quantification.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner challenges rejection, by the Respondents, of its application filed under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the ground that since the quantification of demand is made after 30 June 2019, Petitioner is not eligible to avail the benefit of the said Scheme. The Petitioner had admitted the service tax liability in the course of investigation on 16 April 2019, which is prior to 30 June 2019. The show cause notice issued on 16 October 2019 merely reproduced the quantification made by the Petitioner during investigation.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed an application under the SVLDR Scheme on an unspecified date. The Respondents issued Form SVLDRS-2 rejecting the application. The Petitioner then filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition was reserved on 19 November 2024 and pronounced on 22 November 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Finance Act, 1994:
  • Finance (No.2) Act, 2019: Section 126
  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Approval Under Section 10(23C)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Trust Conducting Educational Institutions for Women Held Eligible for Exemption. The court held that the trust's main object i...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employee's Petition Claiming Second ACPS Benefit. Absorption as Karkoon and Promotion to Civil Engineer Assistant Both Count as Financial Upgradations Under Government Resolution Dated 01-07-2011.