Search Results for "asset diversion"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order in RTI Case — Petitioner Not a Third Party Under Section 11 of RTI Act. Personal Information of Public Servant Sought Cannot Be Denied Under Section 8(1)(j) Without Showing Larger Public Interest.

The petitioner, Smt. S. Savithramma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition in Post-Foreign Award Enforcement Against Guarantor Deleted from Proceedings. Court Examines Applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine to Bind Non-Signatory for Interim Relief.

The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, seeking inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...