Search Results for "arrest panchnama"

707 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 707 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Reserved Judgment in Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder. Evidence of Eyewitnesses and Recovery of Weapons Scrutinized Under Sections 302, 307, 120-B, 449, 143, 144, 147, 148 IPC.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Double Murder and Criminal Conspiracy. Convictions Under Sections 302, 120B, 364 IPC and Arms Act Based on Circumstantial Evidence Challenged on Merits.

The case pertains to the murder of Advocate Pradeep Nalamwar and Vijay Bisne, allegedly carried out at the behest of accused no. 4 Swami, the landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC — Conviction Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(f) Challenged

This appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376(2)(f) of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking CBI Investigation in Assault Case Alleging Political Rivalry. Court holds that mere allegations of political rivalry or delay in investigation do not warrant transfer of investigation to CBI under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Shamin @ Chintu Jamaluddin Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to transfe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Gangaram s/o Jairam Chaudekar, was convicted under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 20 read with Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper procedure and evidence of conscious possession was insufficient.

The appellants, Baldeosingh s/o Jagannathsingh Sengar and Ishwarsingh s/o Dakursingh Gaur, were convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act, Nagpur ...