Search Results for "appealable order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "appealable order"

475 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 475 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Impleadment Order Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act — Impleadment Not an Interlocutory Order Under Section 17. The court held that an order allowing impleadment of parties in arbitration proceedings is not appealable under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as it does not constitute an order under Section 17 of the Act.

10 Apr 2026

The petition was filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order of the learned arbitral tribunal date...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Setting Aside Dismissal of Suit for Default. Appellate Court's Order Condoning Delay Upheld as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Appearance Due to Lack of Knowledge of Transfer of Suit Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC and Section 5 of Limitation Act.

2 Feb 2026

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 227 of 2016, filed a suit which was initially before the Pavi Jetpur Court, then transf...

High Court

High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order for Recovery of Rs. 2398.80 Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Disciplinary Rules

23 Jan 2026

The petitioner, a junior engineer with  Respondent, challenged a disciplinary order dated 14/05/2019 imposing recovery of Rs. 2398.80 for alleged...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Holding Revision Against Condonation of Delay Lies Only Before State Government Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Order condoning 38-year delay in filing appeal under Section 247 of the Code is not appealable under Section 252, hence revision under Section 257 lies only before State Government.

27 Sep 2024

The petitioners, legal heirs of Ganpati Ishwar Ghatge, challenged an order dated 06.04.2022 passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Pune, which...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

18 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Maintainability of Appeal Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. Court Holds That Appeal Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC Lies Against Orders Under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, Including Those Not Expressly Granting or Refusing Injunction.

8 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Augusto T. D'Souza and Ana D'Souza, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 01/12/2012 pas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prohibition Order Against Customs Broker in Licensing Dispute — Regulation 23 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 Cannot Be Invoked Without Prior Suspension or Revocation Proceedings. The court held that Regulation 23 is a residuary power for urgent preventive action and cannot be used to bypass the specific procedures for suspension and revocation under Regulations 17 and 20.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Cargomar, a customs broker governed by the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, filed a writ pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Civil Suit — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Available Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC. The court held that an order dismissing an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC is appealable, and a writ petition is not maintainable when an efficacious alternative remedy exists.

4 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Anand Jaiswal, filed a civil suit seeking a declaration of settled legal possession and an injunction against the respondent, M/s. She...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable in Arbitration Reference Case. Full Bench holds that an order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 referring parties to arbitration is not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, as the Arbitration Act is a self-contained code.

27 Nov 2014

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to decide a reference on the maintainability of an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Paten...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)