Search Results for "analyst report"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revision Petitioner in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by M. Ajithkumar, the proprietor of Swasthik Trading Company, challenging his conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case Due to Non-Service of Public Analyst Report. Mandatory service requirement under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was not met as report was not served on accused, vitiating prosecution and conviction.

The dispute arose from a prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, where the appellant was convicted for selling adulterated ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Delay in Sending Sample and Non-Examination of Public Analyst Fatal to Prosecution Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 25.4.2001 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pune, in R.C.C. No.100 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order of the learned Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Public Analyst's Examination. State fails to prove that Public Analyst personally analysed the sample, a mandatory requirement under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector Rajendra Shankar Bhatkar, filed an appeal against the acquittal of Vilas Ramchandra Aundhkar, the pro...