KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "administrative matter"
5678 result(s) found
Found 5678 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Remand Order in Railway Employee Disciplinary Case — Competence of Disciplinary Authority and Independence of Revisional Authority Require Reconsideration. The Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the CAT's order remitting the matter for fresh consideration on the grounds of competence of the disciplinary authority and independence of the revisional authority.
5 Jan 2017The Union of India, through the General Manager of Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 June 2005 of the Central Admin...
- 130
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Mundkar Dispute — Tribunal Exceeded Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 26 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Mamlatdar and Collector Cannot Be Reversed Without Perversity.
9 Oct 2018The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Mrs. Antoneta Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Communidade's Challenge to Inclusion of Names in List of Able Components. The Court held that the Administrator of Communidades has jurisdiction under Article 42 of the Code of Communidades to direct inclusion of Gaonkars who are able to read and write Portuguese in the list of able components, and that non-payment of contribution is not a bar.
28 Oct 2013The petitioner, Communidade of Pilerne, challenged orders dated 9/11/2012 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Goa, which dismissed its appeals and ...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Promotion with Deemed Date in Service Law Case Due to Delayed Communication of Adverse CR and Subsequent Upgradation. Petitioner entitled to promotion from 15.05.2012 despite initial adverse grading which was later upgraded to 'Very Good'.
29 Mar 2023The petitioner, an employee of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., joined service on 29.06.1999 as Assistant Engineer. For the year 2...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CAT's Lack of Jurisdiction Over Army Officer's Deputation Dispute. Central Administrative Tribunal Correctly Held That Service Matters of Armed Forces Personnel Fall Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of Armed Forces Tribunal Under Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.
28 Jul 2023The petitioner, Lt. Col. Anjan Kumar Sinha, an officer in the Indian Army, applied for and was selected for the post of Registrar at the Armed Forces ...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion Due to Minor Penalty — Government Policy Upheld. Clause B of GR dated 15.12.2017, which denies promotion during currency of penalty, is not violative of Articles 14, 16, and 20(2) of the Constitution.
30 Apr 2020The petitioner, Mohan Vasantrao Sangvikar, a Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Public Works Department, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administr...
- 33
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Administrative Tribunal Transfer Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in High Court. The High Court of Uttarakhand Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition as No Cause of Action Arose Within Its Territory Under Article 226 of Constitution, and Transfer Order Under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Was Valid.
3 Mar 2023The dispute originated from an Original Application filed by a writ petitioner before the Nainital Circuit Bench of the Central Administrative Tribuna...
- 366
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
28 Nov 2025The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...
- 156
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Directing Allocation of IAS Cadre to Kerala - Upholds Union's Allocation Policy and Rules. The Court found that the High Court misread statutory rules and policy on cadre allocation, consultation with State Government, and treatment of OBC candidates qualifying on general merit under the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954, and Civil Services Examination notification.
22 Oct 2021The appeals arose from an order of the High Court of Kerala directing the Union of India to allocate the respondent, a successful candidate in the Civ...
- 178
