Search Results for "additional fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "additional fee"

1898 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1898 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Court Fees Dispute for Injunction Suit. Suit for Simplicitor Injunction Falls Under Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court Fees Act, Not Section 6(iv)(d) for Possession.

13 Feb 2013

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Plaintiffs (Lalchand Kalro and others) against the Respondents (Neeraj Lalchand Kalro and others) chall...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Non-Payment of Court Fee - Remands for Fresh Consideration on Valuation Issue. The court upheld the remand order of the lower appellate court, directing the trial court to decide the preliminary issue regarding valuation and court fee afresh after hearing both sides.

2 Dec 2016

The respondents (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction in respect of plaint schedule property. The appellants (de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with interest under Section 22 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

17 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the orders of the First Cooperative Court and the Maharashtra State C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Fee Hike in Nagpur — No Interference Under Article 226 as Fee Fixation is a Policy Matter for Expert Committees. The court held that the fee structure fixed by the school under the Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2013 is not arbitrary and cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction.

29 Apr 2017

The petitioners, parents of students studying in Modern Primary School and Sandipani School in Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Agency Dispute — Retainer Fee Clause Interpreted as Monthly Payment Obligation. The court upheld the Arbitrator's finding that the Petitioner was liable to pay monthly retainer fees and fees during the notice period under the Company/Agency Agreement.

20 Jan 2014

The Petitioner, Maxx Moblink Pvt. Ltd., a company in the business of marketing and trading mobile phones, entered into a Company/Agency Agreement date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.

24 Jul 2013

The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by School Against Refund Order — Fees Charged by Unaided Minority School Not Subject to Prior Approval Under Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987. The court quashed the Principal Secretary's order directing refund of fees for six academic years as there was no finding of capitation fee or excess fee.

5 Jul 2013

The petitioners, Diamond Jubilee High School and its managing trust, challenged an order dated 27 November 2012 passed by the Principal Secretary (Sch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification in Lalbagh Entry Fee Collection Case — Violation of Transparency and Level Playing Field. Fresh Tender Directed with Revised Conditions to Ensure Fair Competition Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

16 May 2023

The petitioner, Karnataka Commercial and Industrial Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in manpower services and collection of en...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)