Search Results for "acquittal under UAPA"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Petitioner in MPID Act Case Due to Long Incarceration Exceeding Maximum Sentence. Petitioner incarcerated for over 7.5 years as undertrial for offences under MPID Act and IPC; court holds further detention violates Article 21.

The Bombay High Court granted bail to a petitioner who had been incarcerated for over seven and a half years as an undertrial in a case under the Maha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Former Home Minister in PMLA Case — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 Not Satisfied. Applicant held entitled to bail as ED failed to demonstrate reasonable grounds for believing applicant guilty of money laundering under PMLA.

The applicant, Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh, a former Home Minister of Maharashtra, filed a bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Bail Applications of Accused Persons in Murder Case Registered at Kamakshipalya Police Station. Petitioners, Accused of Offences Including Murder and Kidnapping, Seek Regular Bail After Rejection by Sessions Court Under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...