KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Wednesbury principles"
262 result(s) found
Found 262 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.
15 Apr 2024The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Forest Constable Recruitment Case — Cancellation of Select List Upheld Due to Serious Irregularities. Selection Process Conducted Without Written Examination and Violated Reservation Policy, Justifying Fresh Recruitment.
1 May 2023The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Assam and its officers against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court, which had quashed th...
- 1494
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.
30 Jan 2023The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Contract Workers Seeking Direct Employment in Co-operative Bank — Outsourcing of Services Held Permissible. No legal right to employment exists, and the bank's policy decision to outsource non-core services is not subject to judicial review.
4 Jan 2023The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the District Deputy Registrar, Than...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.
2 Nov 2022The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Application of Mind. Externment order under Section 56(1)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 set aside as the Deputy Commissioner of Police failed to independently consider in-camera statements and relied solely on the proposal.
10 Jan 2020The petitioner, Rahul alias Pintu alias Kalu S/o Laxman Nikose, challenged an externment order dated 16.03.2019 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of P...
- 62
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Stop-Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Naval NOC Requirement for Building Construction. Petitioners Challenged Requirement as Ultra Vires MRTP Act After Obtaining IOD and Commencement Certificate Without Such Condition.
27 Feb 2019The petitioners, a co-operative housing society and a developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging a st...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Internal Complaints Committee Report in Sexual Harassment Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Vishaka Guidelines. Committee Constituted Without Independent Member and Proceedings Conducted Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing to Complainant.
4 Oct 2016The petitioner, Vidya Akhave, an employee of IFCI Ltd., filed a complaint of sexual harassment against respondent No.2, Suneet Shukla. An Internal Com...
- 117
