Search Results for "Village Panchayats Meetings Rules 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Village Panchayats Meetings Rules 1959"

47 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Panchayat No-Confidence Motion Dispute — MP's Inclusion for Quorum and Vote Upheld. The Court held that the Member of Parliament representing the Union Territory is a member of the Panchayat Samiti with full voting rights, including in no-confidence motions, under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Panchayats) Regulation, 1994.

1 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the inclusion of a Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Island...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

14 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioners' Challenge to Disqualification as Members of Panchayat Samiti Due to Absence from Meetings. Held that Section 62(1)(b) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 Requires Absence for Three Consecutive Months, Not Three Consecutive Meetings, and Period of Absence of Less Than Three Months Does Not Attract Disqualification.

26 Sep 2017

The case involved six writ petitions arising from a dispute over the disqualification of members of Dhadgaon Panchayat Samiti, Nandurbar, under the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Non-Conduct of Gram Sabha Meetings During COVID-19 Pandemic. Failure to hold four Gram Sabha meetings due to prohibitory orders under Section 144 CrPC and COVID-19 restrictions is not wilful default under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

24 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Manohar Dnyaneshwar Pote, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Gundewadi in Jalna district. Respondent No.3, Sahebrao Balwanta Pote, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Disqualification for Failure to Convene Monthly Meeting. Non-Convening of Meeting Due to Absence of Village Development Officer on Medical Leave Constitutes Reasonable Cause Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

11 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Pundalik Tulshiram Sapkale, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kanalda. He was disqualified by the District Collector, Jalgaon, vide or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

6 Apr 2010

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

24 Jan 2014

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

15 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)