Search Results for "Video Recording"

778 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 778 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Proceedings Under Section 306 IPC for Abetment of Suicide — No Prima Facie Case of Instigation or Abetment Established. Financial Dispute and Suicide Note Without Evidence of Intent to Instigate Suicide Do Not Attract Ingredients of Section 306 IPC.

The applicant, Ramrao Dhakane, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No. 111 of 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, 506(II) IPC and Section 67 IT Act Set Aside.

The case involves two appeals against conviction for gang rape and other offences. The prosecution alleged that on 16 May 2011, the appellants and thr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitioners' Challenge to Bye-law Amendment Resolution and Order in Kolar Union Case Due to Alleged Procedural Impropriety. The Court Examines Admissibility of Video Evidence and Compliance with Section 12 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Background: The dispute arose from the bifurcation and merger of the Kolara-Chikkaballapura District Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Limit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Unauthorized Distribution of Marathi Dramatical Work. Copyright in cinematograph film of dramatic work vests in producer, and unauthorized sale of video copies constitutes infringement under Copyright Act, 1957.

The plaintiffs, Mr. Dilip Jadhav (plaintiff no.1) and Marathi Natyavyavasayik Nirmata Sangh (plaintiff no.2), filed a suit seeking to restrain the def...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Official Secrets Act for Taking Photo of Complaint at Police Station. Petitioner's act of photographing a complaint filed against him does not constitute spying or disclosing secret information under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

The petitioner, Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Defacto Complainant's Petition Seeking Summoning of Magistrate in POCSO Case Citing Absence of Signatures on Victim's Statement. Court Holds That Non-Signing of Section 164 Statement Does Not Vitiate Its Admissibility and Directs Expeditious Trial Completion.

The matter pertained to a writ petition filed by the defacto complainant, the father of a minor girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted at Vibgyor H...