Search Results for "Upa-sarpanch"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Upa-sarpanch"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Caste Validity Certificate Issue Not Decided by Competent Authority, No Right to Speak in No-Confidence Meeting.

18 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Yogini w/o Sanjay Deshmukh, was the elected Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mandawa. A no-confidence motion was initiated against her, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Transfer of Agricultural Subjects to Zilla Parishads in Compliance with Constitutional Mandate and Government Resolution. The court held that the State Government is bound to implement its own resolution dated 01.02.2001 transferring agricultural subjects to Zilla Parishads under Article 243G of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Balasaheb Raghunath Haral, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the State of Maharashtra to hand over agricultural subjects and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Minister's Order Confirmed Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Error. The Court held that the Minister's order dismissing the appeal against removal was not amenable to writ jurisdiction as no error of law or procedure was established.

16 Mar 2016

The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Against Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Upholds Minister's Order Confirming Removal for Misappropriation of Funds. Court holds that the Sarpanch's failure to deposit collected taxes and misuse of funds constitutes 'misappropriation' under Section 39(1)(b) and that the Minister's order was based on sufficient material and not perverse.

16 Mar 2016

The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Toilet Certificate. Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j5) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Upheld as Certificate Obtained After Extended Deadline.

25 Mar 2014

The petitioners, five members of Gram Panchayat Dhanodi, challenged their disqualification under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

14 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

16 Jul 2012

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour, Leading to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings.

2 Feb 2010

The petitioners, six individuals, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate First C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Village Panchayat Election Dispute — No Appeal Lies Against Collector's Order Under Section 33(5) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that the Collector's order under Section 33(5) is final and no appeal lies to the Commissioner.

19 Jan 2010

The appellant, Ashok Sitaram Misal, contested the election for the post of Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kukkadgaon held on 11/10/2008. Respondent No.3, M...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)