Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Toilet Certificate. Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j5) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Upheld as Certificate Obtained After Extended Deadline.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, five members of Gram Panchayat Dhanodi, challenged their disqualification under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The Additional Collector had disqualified them for failing to submit a certificate from the Gram Sabha certifying that they reside in a house owned by them and have a toilet in such house and use it. The Divisional Commissioner dismissed their appeal, noting that the Bombay Village Panchayat and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Second Amendment) Act, 2010 extended the period for submitting such certificate from 90 days to one year from 10.01.2011, i.e., up to 09.01.2012. The Gram Sabha resolution was passed on 10.05.2013 and certificates issued on 11.05.2013, well beyond the deadline. The High Court, after hearing arguments, upheld the disqualification, finding that the petitioners had not complied with the mandatory requirement within the extended period. The court dismissed the writ petition, confirming the orders of the Additional Collector and Divisional Commissioner.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Disqualification of Members - Section 14(1)(j5) Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 - Requirement of Certificate - The petitioners were disqualified for not submitting a Gram Sabha certificate certifying that they reside in a house owned by them with a toilet and use it. The Divisional Commissioner upheld the disqualification on the ground that the certificate was obtained on 11.05.2013, beyond the extended period up to 09.01.2012. The High Court held that the disqualification was valid as the petitioners failed to comply with the mandatory requirement within the prescribed time. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the disqualification of the petitioners under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 for failure to submit a certificate of the Gram Sabha regarding ownership of house and toilet facility within the extended period up to 09.01.2012 was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the Divisional Commissioner and the disqualification of the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j5) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act
  • 1958
  • Gram Sabha resolution
  • toilet certificate
  • extension of time
  • one year from 10.01.2011
  • mandatory requirement
  • strict compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (03) 112

Writ Petition No. 1564/2014

2014-03-25

R. K. Deshpande

Shri A.V.Gawande for Petitioners, Shri K.L.Dharmadhikari for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Shri J.B.Kasat for Respondent No.4

Vijay Ramchandra Raut, Kishor Vithobaji Zade, Santosh Uttamrao Jawalkar, Sau. Manisha Surendra Joshi, Sau. Shubangi Atul Dukre

Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati; Additional Collector, Amravati; Village Panchayat, Dhanodi; Shankarrao Rangraoji Mohture

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification of members of Gram Panchayat under Section 14(1)(j5) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of order dated 05.03.2014 passed by Divisional Commissioner dismissing their appeal against disqualification.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were disqualified for failing to submit a certificate from Gram Sabha certifying that they reside in a house owned by them with a toilet and use it.

Previous Decisions

Additional Collector disqualified petitioners; Divisional Commissioner dismissed appeal on 05.03.2014.

Issues

Whether the disqualification under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 was valid when the certificate was obtained after the extended deadline of 09.01.2012.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the disqualification was improper. Respondents supported the disqualification on the ground of non-compliance within the extended period.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 to submit a Gram Sabha certificate regarding ownership of house and toilet facility is mandatory. The extended period up to 09.01.2012 must be strictly complied with; failure to do so results in valid disqualification.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 05.03.2014 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, dismissing Appeal No. 12/BVP16(2)/Dhanodi/201314 filed by the petitioners challenging their disqualification under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Thus, the Appellants have failed to submit Certificates along with the Resolution of the Gram Sabha till the date of 09.01.2012.

Procedural History

The Additional Collector disqualified the petitioners. They appealed to the Divisional Commissioner, who dismissed the appeal on 05.03.2014. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958: Section 14(1)(j5)
  • Bombay Village Panchayat and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Second Amendment) Act, 2010:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Toilet Certificate. Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j5) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Upheld as Certificate Obtained A...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that documents relevant for defence must be allowed to be produced and admitted or denied under Se...