Search Results for "Tribunal Award Modified"

1875 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1875 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Claimant's income reassessed and compensation enhanced for loss of future income, pain and suffering, and medical expenses under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Mr. M. Raju, a 25-year-old vegetable vendor, sustained grievous injur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Motor Accident — Permanent Disability Assessed at 70% with Multiplier of 18. The court held that the Tribunal erred in assessing disability at 30% and applied correct multiplier and future prospects as per law.

The appellant, Ketaki Milind Kulkarni, a minor aged 8 years at the time of the accident, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...