Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1050 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1050 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Declaration Dispute Based on Landlord's Admission. Landlord's admission of tenancy under Section 7-B of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is binding and cannot be ignored by appellate authorities.

The petitioner, Meenakshi M. Gurao, claimed to be a tenant of disputed land and applied to the Tahsildar, Guhagar, on 15-6-1988 under Section 7-B of t...