Search Results for "TRF Ltd."

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "TRF Ltd."

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a project named...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) Allowed Despite Bad Debt Claim Under Section 36(1)(vii) Being Time-Barred. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business which become irrecoverable and written off in books of account are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even if the claim under Section 36(1)(vii) fails due to non-compliance with Section 36(2).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property name...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property name...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Venue Change in Arbitration Dispute — Clause 19.3(b) of Agreement Held to Specify Seat, Not Venue, Under Section 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Dhule Municipal Commissioner, challenged an interim order dated 16/06/2024 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Proceeding No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.

7 Aug 2023

The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Transport Contract Dispute — State's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Jul 2021

The applicant, Prakash Askram Jain, entered into a transport agreement with the Governor of Maharashtra on 30/03/2001 for transporting food grains and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Electricity Transmission Contract Dispute. Court upholds majority award granting escalation costs and interest to contractor for delays caused by principal.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., challenged a majority arbitral award dated 6 January 2017 under Section 34 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 3.01 Crore with 18% Interest. Court holds that the Arbitrator's findings on liability and interest rate are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Mar 2019

This judgment arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Meenu Arora, Raj Kumar Arora, Ethics Exp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Loan Dispute — Appoints Sole Arbitrator for IIFL Finance Disputes. Court finds that disputes arising from loan agreements containing arbitration clauses are arbitrable and appoints a retired judge as sole arbitrator.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed by DS Textiles, Madhuram Fabrics Pvt Ltd, and P R Packing Service against IIFL Finance Limited...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)