Search Results for "Spot Panchnama"

1627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2011

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Shailendrakumar Satyanarayan Thakur, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, on 25th October 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Hurt Under Sections 302 and 324 IPC. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302 and 324 with Section 149 Based on Evidence of Unlawful Assembly and Assault Leading to Death and Injury.

The appeal arose from the conviction of six accused/appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 277 of 2012 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, hears appeal against conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of wife by husband. The case involves a dying declaration recorded in a 92% burn case and doubts about its reliability due to medical evidence and inconsistent witness testimonies.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard Criminal Appeal No. 272 of 2013 filed by Arjun Uddhav Arbad against his conviction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.327 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers State and Complainant's Applications for Cancellation of Anticipatory Bail in Homicide Case. The Court examines whether Sessions Court erred in granting bail after charge under Section 302 IPC was added despite medical evidence indicating homicidal death.

The dispute pertained to the death of Pooja, the wife of the accused, on 14 June 2000. Initially, the accused claimed she committed suicide due to men...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 20 read with Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper procedure and evidence of conscious possession was insufficient.

The appellants, Baldeosingh s/o Jagannathsingh Sengar and Ishwarsingh s/o Dakursingh Gaur, were convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act, Nagpur ...