Search Results for "Spot Delivery Contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Spot Delivery Contract"

87 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Rule 6(3)(d) of Karnataka Urban Development Authority Rules 1991 as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional — Refund of Auction Deposit Ordered with Interest. Rule 6(3)(d) allowing forfeiture of deposit without proof of loss was held to be in conflict with Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and thus ultra vires the Constitution.

2 Jan 2013

The petitioners, Shri K Babjan and K Sulaiman, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(3)(d) o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute Over Lease and License Agreement — Held That Licensee Cannot Claim Tenancy Rights Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court affirmed that the agreement was a license, not a lease, and the suit for possession was within limitation.

7 May 2021

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a petrol pump site at Santacruz, Mumbai. The petitioners (original plaintiffs) are the owners o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Banking Investment Dispute - Failure of Respondent to Nominate Arbitrator Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of an Agreement dated 18th April, 2018 and Deed of Guarantee dated 18th April, 2018, as the respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator.

17 Jul 2023

The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a public company and banking company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award Holding Put and Call Options in Share Purchase Agreement as Enforceable. The court held that clauses 8.5 and 8.5.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement are not forward contracts or derivatives under SCRA and SEBI circulars, and the Single Judge erred in setting aside the award.

2 Feb 2023

The appellants, Percept Finserve Private Limited and Percept Limited, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Edelweiss Financial Services Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Winding-Up Petition, Sets Aside Conditional Deposit Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute over unpaid dues under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 cannot be adjudicated in winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

10 Oct 2018

The appeal arose from an order dated 27 September 2017 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No. 192 of 2016, directing the responde...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeals Against Rejection of Applications for Rejection of Plaint in Multi-Crore Commodity Default Suit. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Applications by Nominee Directors Dismissed at Threshold; Court to Examine Plaint Averments on Director Involvement in Spot Exchange Defaults.

5 May 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, considered two appeals filed by Gopal Shrinivasan and Shankar Bal...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)