Search Results for "Shareholders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Shareholders"

557 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 557 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Shareholders in Capital Receipt Case — One Million Euros Received from Vedior NV Held Exempt as Capital Receipt. Compensation for Loss of Right of First Refusal and Non-Compete Agreement Treated as Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Jan 2026

The case involves two appeals by shareholders (K. Pandiarajan and R. Hemalatha) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which up...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award on Share Sale Proceeds. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that petitioner signed mandate letter for sale of shares and loan repayment, rejecting allegations of fraud and forgery.

19 May 2020

The petitioner, Jackie Kukubhai Shroff, and the respondent, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, were shareholders in Atlas Equipfin Pvt. Ltd. (Atlas), which held shar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

7 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer and Oppression. Court upholds CLB's refusal to dismiss petition under Section 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956, finding prima facie case of oppression and mismanagement.

20 Dec 2012

The judgment arises from a company appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, by M/s. Gharda Chemicals Limited and others against an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Arbitration as Shareholders Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. The court held that the respondents, being parties to the shareholders agreement, must be referred to arbitration despite the petitioner not being a party to that agreement.

4 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rohini Industrial Electricals Limited, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Interim Injunction Set Aside Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case for trademark infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as the mark was originally owned by the joint venture company and the assignment was disputed.

28 Jul 2011

The case involves two appeals against a common judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.553 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

11 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Motion for Interim Relief in Shareholders' Agreement Dispute — Put Option Enforceable Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Extraction Target. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction as the agreement was clear and the defendants had exercised their contractual put option.

6 Sep 2010

The plaintiffs, IND Synergy Ltd. and its promoters, filed a suit seeking a declaration that they had not failed to extract 1 million tonnes of iron or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Cairn India Limited with Foreign Subsidiaries Under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court approved the transfer of Indian undertakings from four foreign subsidiaries to the Indian listed company to simplify corporate structure.

22 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Cairn India Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and listed on Indian stock exchanges, filed a petition under...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)