Search Results for "Seniority"

974 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 974 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Directing Seniority Revision and Promotion After Petitioner Already Promoted — Education Officer Lacks Jurisdiction Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules Once Promotion Is Granted.

The petitioner, Girish Suresh Jambhalikar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 10.07.1995 in a school run by respondent No.3 Management. He posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Promotion Select List for District Judges in Gujarat — Merit-cum-Seniority Principle Upheld. High Court's Suitability Test Components and Weightage Valid Under Rule 5 of Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Select List dated 10.03.2023 issued by the High Court of Gujarat for prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...